Connect with us

Industry

Dangote, BUA in limestone war as Dangote sells shares for $350m

Published

on


A battle over ownership of  limestone deposits in Kogi state is raging between the Dangote Group and cement rival BUA Group, with the Dangote management accusing BUA of stealing billion dollars worth of limestone belonging to it at the mining sites in Kogi state. Meanwhile some 550 million shares of Dangote Cement were sold at N225.7  each on Monday in a one-off stock market deal valued at $350 million, traders said.
It was a negotiated deal between seller Meristem Stockbrokers Ltd and buyer CSL Stockbrokers Ltd.

But, the management of BUA International Limited  has denied the allegation., saying it was part of the  plot by the Dangote group to “out-muscle” it out  of business. Obu lime stone deposit is in Okpella in Edo state not in Okene as alleged by Dangote management. the contentious deposit was operated by Okpella Cement company which later became Bendel Cement that was privatised and sold to BUA.

According to Dangote’s Executive Director, Mr. Devakumar Edwin, the BUA group had led armed gangs to the limestone site  which it owns in Kogi state to  deplete and exhaust the  reserves to sabotage Dangote Group’s legitimate investment.  “It is therefore appalling that BUA Group in the midst of these overwhelming facts will still want the public to believe that Dangote Group is after its business when in actual fact BUA has been the one mining illegally in Dangote Mining Lease and attacking its officials without any justification, he said. Edwin accused BUA of  coming like a thief in the night armed to illegally steal limestone deposited in its Mining Lease No. 2541, located in a boundary town of Oguda/Ubo in Okene Kogi State The matter is already pending before the Federal High Court, Benin Division “Dangote Group validly acquired its interest and mining title in the disputed Mining Lease No. 2541 from AICO Ado Ibrahim Company Ltd sometime in 2014. AICO itself had applied to the Mining Cadastre Office and Ministry of Mines and Steel Development for the said Mining Lease No. 2541 located in a boundary town of Oguda/Ubo in Okene Kogi State in 2007.

“The Ministry in exercise of its power under the Nigerian Minerals and Mining Act, 2007 granted and issued to AICO ML. No. 2541 for the renewable period of 25 years effective from 1 February 2008 and to expire on 31 January, 2033Thus AICO by virtue of the said grant, became vested with the legal title over ML. No. 2541. In 2014, the Dangote Group approached AICO and indicated interest in acquiring AICO’s stake in ML No. 2541. In 2014, AICO in exercise of its right under the Mining Act, applied to the Ministry for the transfer of its title in the ML No. 2541 to Dangote Group. AICO and Dangote Group equally paid all the transfer and statutory fees demanded by the Ministry.  By a letter dated 05 February 2016, the Ministry wrote to the Managing Director of the Dangote Group to convey the approval of the Ministry for the Transfer/Assignment of ML No. 2541 from AICO to Dangote Group with effect from 03 February 2016. Following the successful transfer of ML. NO. 2541 to Dangote Group, the Group became the holder of the Mining Lease No. 2541.”

He said even BUA in its process in Court acknowledged that these illegal mining leases which it claimed were granted in 1997 were temporary mining leases. Edwin  recalled that the then Minister for Solid Minerals under Olusegun Obasanjo’s regime, Dr Oby Ezekwesili sometime in 2006 waded into the dispute and invited the managements of Edo Cement Company Limited and AICO Ado Ibrahim & Company Limited for a meeting and that in the course of the meeting,  the then Minister again queried the legality of Mining Lease Nos 18912 and 18913 and the power of the Governor of Edo State to grant such mining leases.

“At the end of the Meeting, the Minister declared the Edo Cement’s Mining Leases Nos. 18912 and 18913 illegal and declared the mining site open for interested investors. Given that AICO’s then existing Mining Lease No. 17825 was yet to be renewed even though application for renewal was pending, AICO in 2007 (under the Mining Act, 2007) applied for the fresh Mining Lease No. 2541 and the Ministry granted it in 2008 without any objection from Edo Cement Company.”

Edwin said AICO, who sold the right to Dangote, continued its mining operations in the Mining Lease No. 2541 undisturbed until BUA Group acquired Edo Cement Company Limited and resuscitated the dispute again. Edwin further revealed that it was the attempt by BUA to encroach on AICO’s mining title in Mining Lease No. 2541 that prompted AICO to write to the Ministry in 2015 complaining of BUA’s encroachment.
“The Ministry after investigation in the same 2015 by the letter dated 21 January 2015 wrote to the Chairman of BUA Group directing BUA to stop mining within the ML. No. 2541. It was this same letter from the Ministry that prompted BUA to file a Suit at the Federal High Court Benin in 2016.”

In a statement Sunday night, BUA said: “This latest statement by Dangote Group stinks of desperation in its continued attempt to disregard the judicial process and scheme a viable competitor out of business as has been their legendary antecedent
“We thus wish to reiterate once again that whilst we do not want to join issues with anyone on this matter as it is currently before a court of competent jurisdiction, we are however compelled to use the opportunity presented by Edwin Devakumar’s reckless statements to clarify the cycle of misinformation being proliferated.

“In specific response to Edwin Devakumar of Dangote Group’s claim of BUA operating on ML2541 in Okene, Kogi State, we wish to restate that BUA does not have any operations whatsoever in Okene, Kogi State where the purported ML2541 is situated.
Our Mining operations are limited to Obu-Okpella, Edo State for which licenses ML18912 & 18913 were issued and revalidate by the same ministry in a publica. These licences have been owned, operated and fulfilled by BUA and its predecessors-in-title since 1976 as it is also a notorious fact that we have exercised total control and possession over the mining area covered by the above mining leases since 1976 when we operated under the name of Bendel Cement Company Limited. We are thus wont to excuse Edwin’s claims to a lack of basic knowledge and understanding of the geography of Nigeria but he will be better served if he seeks professional opinion in critically understanding the geography of Nigeria or he should otherwise refer to documents from the boundary commission which clearly delineates boundaries within Nigeria.
“We also wish to ask – Why is Dangote, an international company which is also listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange, so averse to letting the rule of the law and judicial process take its course? The court has maintained that Status Quo be maintained (This includes BUA’s current ownership of our mines in Edo State) but the management of Dangote Group Dangote, as has been their strategy in the past to other companies in competition with them, is still seeking to out-muscle competition through backdoor means rather than let the court decide.

“If anyone is not satisfied, they should write to the courts as an independent arbiter for an interpretation of ‘maintaining status quo’ rather than spread misinformation in the court of public opinion. The antecedents of Dangote Plc in trying to outmuscle competition is not in doubt. Various cases abound within and outside the cement industry – one of which was their taking over of the limestone deposits of another competing entity in the south-south region of Nigeria until they ceeded him 25% of their company.

This was in turn resold to them for hundreds of millions of dollars. Or is it the case of Ibeto whose business was almost driven under but for the prompt intervention of the then late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua. Or is it the case of Polo House Jetty Tincan previously owned by Usman Dantata, whose License was revoked by NPA and reallocated to Dangote on the same day in order to prevent a sugar refinery to be sited there by a competitor. “The facts of the matter as far as we are concerned is that BUA’s operations are in Obu, Okpella, Edo State and not Okene Kogi. We once again ask that all parties should wait for the court to resolve the issue. We will not be cowed or intimidated and will continue to seek redress through the proper legal channels.”

Continue Reading

Industry

Dangote contracts Honeywell International for major refinery capacity upgrade to 1.4m barrels per day  

Published

on

Dangote Group is pleased to announce that it has entered a strategic partnership with Honeywell International Inc to support the next phase of expansion of the Dangote Petroleum Refinery. This collaboration will provide advanced technology and services that will enable the refinery to increase its processing capacity to 1.4 million barrels per day by 2028, marking a major milestone in our long-term vision to build the world’s largest petroleum refining complex. Through this agreement, Honeywell will supply specialised catalysts, equipment, and process technologies that will allow the refinery to process a broader slate of crude grades efficiently and to further enhance product quality and operational reliability.

Honeywell, a global Fortune 100 industrial and technology company, offers a wide portfolio of solutions across aviation, automotive, industrial automation, and advanced materials. Honeywell’s division UOP has been a technology partner to Dangote since 2017, providing proprietary refining systems, catalyst regeneration equipment, high performance column trays, and heat exchanger technologies that support our best-in-class operations.
Dangote Group is also advancing its petrochemical footprint. As part of the wider collaboration, we are scaling our polypropylene capacity to 2.4 million metric tons annually using Honeywell’s Oleflex technology. Polypropylene is a key industrial material widely used across packaging, manufacturing, and automotive applications. In addition to refining expansion, Dangote Group is progressing with the next phase of its fertiliser growth plan in Nigeria. We will increase our urea production capacity from 3 million metric tons to 9 million metric tons annually.

The existing plant consists of two trains of 1.5 million metric tons each. The expansion will add four additional trains to meet growing demand for high-quality fertiliser across Africa and global markets. Dangote Group remains fully committed to delivering world-class industrial capacity, strengthening Nigeria’s energy security, and driving sustainable economic growth through long-term investment, innovation, and strategic global partnerships.

Continue Reading

Industry

Toyota, Honda turn India into car production hub away from China

Published

on

Toyota, Honda, and Suzuki are spending billions of dollars to build new cars and factories in India, a sign of the country’s growing importance as a manufacturing hub as Japanese automakers redraw global supply chains to reduce dependence on China. Leo, the world’s largest carmaker, and Suzuki, the leader in the Indian market with almost a 40 per cent share, have separately announced investments totalling $11 billion to beef up manufacturing and export capabilities in the world’s third-largest auto market. Honda announced last week that it will establish India as a production and export base for one of its planned electric vehicles.


India’s low costs and vast labour pool have long been an attraction for manufacturers. Now, Japanese automakers are stepping up their operations as they pivot away from China, both as a market and a manufacturing base, according to multiple industry executives. India remains all but closed to Chinese EVs, so Japan’s carmakers – at least for now – will not face bruising competition from BYD and others there.

A brutal price war among Chinese EV makers has made it difficult for them to turn a profit. Adding to the pain, Chinese carmakers are now expanding overseas and snatching market share from Japanese rivals in Southeast Asia. “India is a good choice as a replacement market for China,” said Julie Boote, autos analyst at Pelham Smithers Associates in London, citing low profit margins in China. For the time being, the Japanese think it’s a much better market because they don’t have to deal with the Chinese competitors.” Other draws include the improved quality of India’s manufactured goods and incentives from Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government, according to the executives.

Toyota and Suzuki each have majority ownership of their Indian units. Honda owns 100% of its business there. Japan’s annual direct investment in the Indian transport sector, which includes automakers, jumped more than sevenfold between 2021 and 2024, reaching 294 billion yen (about $2 billion) last year.

As Japanese automakers revved up investment in India, they cooled on China: direct investment in China’s transport sector saw an 83 per cent decrease over the same period, to 46 billion yen last year. Toyota is collaborating with Japanese and Indian vendors to reduce costs and increase production of hybrid components. India is one market where a tight supply of hybrid parts has been observed amid a surge in demand this year. It has localised its offerings, said an executive at a major Toyota supplier.

The Japanese automaker plans to launch 15 new and refreshed models in India by the end of the decade and deepen its rural network, Reuters reported last week. It aims to capture 10 per cent of the passenger car market by the end of the decade, up from its current eight percent share. “The Indian market is extremely important and is set to grow in the future,” Toyota president Koji Sato told reporters at last week’s Japan Mobility Show, noting many other automakers were also paying attention to the market.

Last year, Toyota announced more than $3 billion in investment to expand production at its existing factory in southern India by about 100,000 vehicles per year and build a new plant in western Maharashtra state, which is expected to begin production before 2030. That is expected to take Toyota’s Indian production capacity to more than one million vehicles. At its quarterly earnings on Wednesday, the automaker highlighted the growing importance of India to its profits, particularly as the North American business has been impacted by tariffs. India’s economic growth has averaged eight per cent over the past three fiscal years, a surge that Mr Modi’s government wants to sustain by luring more foreign manufacturers.

It is rolling out incentives to get them to produce goods for both domestic and global markets. India manufactured about five million passenger cars during the last financial year, of which almost 800,000 were exported, and the remainder were sold in the domestic market. Domestic sales grew about 2 per cent from a year ago, while exports rose 15 per cent. Government limits on Chinese investment are effectively another form of assistance, making it difficult for new Chinese carmakers to enter and for existing ones, such as SAIC’s MG Motor and BYD. “India’s protectionist stance toward neighbouring countries is a blessing in disguise for Japanese carmakers,” said S&P Global Mobility’s Gaurav Vangaal. “Because of this, they see an opportunity to expand investment in India, enhancing their cost competitiveness against domestic players.”

Local companies Tata Motors and Mahindra & Mahindra have been expanding their offerings with SUVs, taking market share from Suzuki. Before the pandemic, Suzuki held about 50 per cent of the passenger car market. India is never an easy market. Foreign automakers such as Ford and General Motors previously struggled there and eventually exited.
For Honda, India is the largest market for its highly profitable two-wheeler business, and it now intends to expand its four-wheeler business, chief executive Toshihiro Mibe told the mobility show.

Honda said its top three focus markets for the car business are the United States, followed by India and Japan. It plans to make India the production and export base for one of its ‘Zero series’ electric cars, with one model to be exported to Japan and other Asian markets from 2027. Suzuki’s $8 billion investment in India is primarily aimed at expanding its local production capacity to four million cars per year, from the current 2.5 million. Its Indian business, Maruti Suzuki, is the country’s top-selling carmaker and largest car exporter.

“We would like to grow India as Suzuki’s global production hub,” president Toshihiro Suzuki told reporters on the sidelines of the mobility show. “We would like to enhance exports from India.” (Reuters/NAN)

Continue Reading

Industry

FG, states wasting Nigeria’s money on imported vehicles, neglecting local manufacturers—Senator Fadahunsi

Published

on

Francis Fadahunsi, chairman of the Senate Committee on Industry, has expressed dismay over the low patronage of made-in-Nigeria automobiles by the federal and state governments.

Mr Fadahunsi made the observation during the committee members’ visit to Anambra Motor Manufacturing Company (ANAMMCO) in Enugu on Friday. The chairman said they discovered that a lot of potential was being wasted at Innoson Motors and ANAMMCO due to a lack of patronage from the federal and state governments.

“If the federal and state governments are patronising our indigenous vehicle assemblers, manufacturers, and CNG buses, Nigeria will be a better place instead of wasting our money and foreign resources to import vehicles. What we have seen in Enugu and Anambra is in line with the president’s New Hope Agenda. There are no types of buses that the government is looking for that these local assemblers and manufacturers cannot produce,” Mr Fadahunsi said. The senator said indigenous vehicle assemblers and manufacturers need legal backing and funds from the federal government.

He called on ministries, departments, and agencies to patronise made-in-Nigeria vehicles, adding that by doing so, they would be reinvesting in the economy and creating jobs for unemployed youths. Mr Fadahunsi also said the Senate committee would convince their colleagues to start patronising vehicles produced in Nigeria and assist in enacting bills to make them thrive.

Oluwemimo Osanipin, the director-general of the National Automotive Design and Development Council (NADDC), commended the committee for its oversight function, adding that the automobile sector had the capacity to generate a lot of multiplier effects in the economy.

He tasked governments with policies that would encourage the purchase of locally manufactured goods and stimulate demand, which also allowed individuals to buy. Mr Osanipin added that the committee’s visit would offer them the opportunity to identify the challenges of auto operators and areas needing support. The chief operating officer of ANAMMCO, Bennett Ejindu, described the visit as a “positive development,” saying it underscored the importance the President Bola Tinubu administration and Senate attached to industrial development.

Mr. Ejindu recalled that ANAMMCO was established in the 1970s, and that the industry’s abandonment between 1970 and 1986 led the world to believe that Nigeria was not serious about developing the automotive industry. The operating officer added that governments could also assist in revitalise the industry through direct involvement and the creation of an enabling environment for the industry to thrive. NAN

Continue Reading

Trending