Connect with us

News

Crownfield Solicitors to drag ECOWAS heads of states to ICJ over anti-human rights’ policies

Published

on

Renowned legal firm specializing in social advocacy and human rights, Crownfield Solicitors, has threatened to drag Heads of States of ECOWAS to the International Court of Justice over their push for anti-human rights’ policies. The legal body said in a compelling letter to all the President of the ECOWAS states, expressing grave concerns over the proposed changes to the jurisdiction of the ECOWAS Community Court of Justice. Chief Festus A. Ogwuche, the principal partner of Crownfield and a Constitutional Lawyer, highlighted the potential implications of altering the court’s established jurisdictional criteria and the admissibility of complaints. Ogwuche said the move stemmed from recent deliberations among the Authority of Heads of States and Government, as well as the meeting of regional Chief Justices constituting the Judicial Service Commission of the ECOWAS court, raising objections to proposals aimed at modifying the court’s core jurisdictional features, particularly regarding the criteria for the admissibility of complaints.

He underscored the critical role of the ECOWAS court in safeguarding fundamental rights against violations by member states, arguing that while the objective of establishing a common legal order for prompt adherence to court decisions is commendable, the proposed approach of mandating exhaustion of local remedies before invoking the court’s jurisdiction calls for re-evaluation. Ogwuche highlighted the systemic weaknesses plaguing domestic judicial systems across Africa, which often fail to provide effective justice due to inadequate resources, political interference, and lack of autonomy, emphasising the necessity of international mechanisms like the ECOWAS court to complement national institutions in upholding human rights. He cautioned against the introduction of requirements for exhaustion of local remedies, which could undermine the progress achieved in regional legal frameworks and human rights enforcement since the court’s establishment in 1975, stressing the importance of maintaining the ECOWAS court’s concurrent jurisdiction with state systems, particularly in addressing human rights violations.

Ogwuche reminded of the ECOWAS court’s role as a court of first instance for enforcing fundamental rights, filling the gaps left by national judicial systems, stressing that the court’s jurisdiction extends beyond domestic legal frameworks, ensuring the enforceability of rights guaranteed by international treaties, even in the face of non-justiciable clauses in national constitutions. It read in part: “Rules relating to exhaustion of local remedies are usually based on Treaty provisions granting jurisdiction to courts, and it is a rule of admissibility, and not necessarily jurisdiction. Recall Sir, that Protocol A/P.1/7/79 on the court of Justice adopted in Abuja on 6th July, 1991 was reviewed essentially to enable the court enforce fundamental rights as a court of first instance. This is response to the failures of member states in the dispensation and enforcement of the internationally guaranteed rights and the glaring prospects of a regional court triumphing over the weakness of national human rights systems. It must be noted that the specie of rights enforced by the court transcends the generation of rights contained in domestic courts.

 “Note further that the problem of enforcement is a function of the lack of will and disinclination of the states to accord the court the recognition it deserves. The case of CHUDE MBAH V THE REPUBLIC OF GHANA, SUIT NO. ECW/CCJ/JUD//30/18; and AMBASSADOR ALEX SAAB MORAN V CAPE VERDE, SUIT NO ECW/CCJ/JUD/07/21 readily come to mind here, and crystallise this position.” Ogwuche, however, proposed alternative measures to enhance compliance with ECOWAS court decisions, such as amending protocols or ratifying the Revised ECOWAS Treaty at the national level, warning against unilateral alterations to the court’s jurisdiction by member states, emphasising the court’s mandate to protect the rights of community citizens. He warned of potential international legal action if proposed changes to the ECOWAS court’s jurisdiction proceed, vowing to seek redress and protection for community citizens affected by such alterations. “Take notice that if the Authority of the Heads of States and Governments are minded to go ahead with this strategically ruinous proposal, then we shall have no other alternative than to approach or proceed to the appropriate international judicial, quasi-judicial and administrative fora to seek provisional measures, redress and protection for the citizens of the community against such abridgement of their fundamental rights by community members,” he added.

Continue Reading

News

Nigeria–China tech deal to boost jobs, skills, local opportunities

Published

on

A new technology transfer agreement between the Nigeria–China Strategic Partnership (NCSP) and the Presidential Implementation Committee on Technology Transfer (PICTT) is expected to open more job opportunities, improve local skills, and expand access to advanced technology for ordinary Nigerians. 

In a press statement reaching Vanguard on Friday, the MoU aims to strengthen industrial development, support local content, and create clearer pathways for Nigerians to benefit from China’s growing investments in the country.

PICTT Chairman, Dr Dahiru Mohammed, said the partnership will immediately begin coordinated programmes that support local participation in infrastructure and industrial projects.

Special Adviser to the President on Industry, Trade and Investment, Mr John Uwajumogu, said the deal will help attract high value investments that can stimulate job creation and strengthen Nigeria’s economy.

NCSP Head of International Relations, Ms Judy Melifonwu, highlighted that Nigerians stand to gain from expanded STEM scholarships, technical training, access to modern technology, and collaboration across key sectors including steel, agriculture, automobile parks, and cultural industries.

The NCSP Director-General reaffirmed the organisation’s commitment to measurable results, noting that the partnership with PICTT will prioritise initiatives that deliver direct national impact.

The MoU signals a new phase of Nigeria–China cooperation focused on practical delivery, local content, and opportunities that improve everyday livelihoods.

Continue Reading

News

EU hits Meta with antitrust probe over plans to block AI rivals from WhatsApp

Published

on

EU regulators launched an antitrust investigation into Meta Platforms on Thursday over its rollout of artificial intelligence features in its WhatsApp messenger that would block rivals, hardening Europe’s already tough stance on Big Tech. The move, reported earlier by Reuters and the Financial Times, is the latest action by European Union regulators against large technology firms such as Amazon and Alphabet’s Google as the bloc seeks to balance support for the sector with efforts to curb its expanding influence.

Europe’s tough stance – a marked contrast to more lenient U.S. regulation – has sparked an industry pushback, particularly by U.S. tech titans, and led to criticism from the administration of U. S. President Donald Trump. The European Commission said that the investigation will look into Meta’s new policy that would limit other AI providers’ access to WhatsApp, a potential boost for its own Meta AI system integrated into the platform earlier this year.

EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera said the move was to prevent dominant firms from “abusing their power to crowd out innovative competitors”. She added interim measures could be imposed to block Meta’s new WhatsApp AI policy rollout. “AI markets are booming in Europe and beyond,” she said. This is why we are investigating if Meta’s new policy might be illegal under competition rules, and whether we should act quickly to prevent any possible irreparable harm to competition in the AI space.”

A WhatsApp spokesperson called the claims “baseless”, adding that the emergence of chatbots on its platforms had put a “strain on our systems that they were not designed to support”, a reference to AI systems from other providers. “Still, the AI space is highly competitive and people have access to the services of their choice in any number of ways, including app stores, search engines, email services, partnership integrations, and operating systems.” The EU was the first in the world to establish a comprehensive legal framework for AI, setting out guardrails for AI systems and rules for certain high-risk applications in the AI Act.

Meta AI, a chatbot and virtual assistant, has been built into WhatsApp’s interface across European markets since March. The Commission said a new policy fully applicable from January 15, 2026, may block competing AI providers from reaching customers via the platform. Ribera said the probe came on the back of complaints from small AI developers about the WhatsApp policy. The Interaction Company of California, which has developed AI assistant Poke.com, has taken its grievance to the EU competition enforcer. Spanish AI startup Luzia has also talked to the Commission, a person with knowledge of the matter said.

Marvin von Hagen, co-founder and CEO of The Interaction Company of California, said if Meta was allowed to roll out its new policy, “millions of European consumers will be deprived of the possibility of enjoying new and innovative AI assistants”. Meta also risks a fine of as much as 10% of its global annual turnover if found guilty of breaching EU antitrust rules.

Italy’s antitrust watchdog opened a parallel investigation in July into allegations that Meta leveraged its market power by integrating an AI tool into WhatsApp, expanding the probe in November to examine whether Meta further abused its dominance by blocking rival AI chatbots from the messaging platform. The antitrust probe is a more traditional means of investigation than the EU’s Digital Markets Act, the bloc’s landmark legislation currently used to scrutinize Amazon’s and Microsoft’s cloud services for potential curbs. Reuters

Continue Reading

News

Billionaires are inheriting record levels of wealth, UBS report finds

Published

on

The spouses and children of billionaires inherited more wealth in 2025 than in any previous year since reporting began in 2015, according to UBS’s Billionaire Ambitions Report published on Thursday. In the 12 months to April, 91 people became billionaires through inheritance, collectively receiving $298 billion, up more than a third from 2024, the Swiss bank said. “These heirs are proof of a multi-year wealth transfer that’s intensifying,” UBS executive Benjamin Cavalli said.

The report is based on a survey of some of UBS’s super-rich clients and a database that tracks the wealth of billionaires across 47 markets in all world regions. At least $5.9 trillion will be inherited by billionaire children over the next 15 years, the bank calculates.
Most of this inheritance growth is set to take place in the United States, with India, France, Germany and Switzerland next on the list, UBS estimated. However, billionaires are highly mobile, especially younger ones, which could change that picture, it added. The search for a better quality of life, geopolitical concerns and tax considerations are driving decisions to relocate, according to the report.

In Switzerland, where $206 billion will be inherited over the next 15 years according to the bank, voters on Sunday overwhelmingly rejected 50 per cent tax on inherited fortunes of $62 million or more, after critics said it could trigger an exodus of wealthy people.
Switzerland, the UAE, the U.S. and Singapore are among billionaires’ preferred destinations, UBS’s Cavalli said. “In Switzerland, Sunday’s vote may have helped to increase the country’s appeal again,” he said. Reuters

Continue Reading

Trending